Talk:Te Deum and Jubilate in A Major (1740) (William Boyce): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(response to query) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Possibly, but I expect to add the Te Deum in about a week, having discovered that a copy of the source is online [[User:Jonathang|Jonathang]] 18:01, 20 May 2012 (CDT) | Possibly, but I expect to add the Te Deum in about a week, having discovered that a copy of the source is online [[User:Jonathang|Jonathang]] 18:01, 20 May 2012 (CDT) | ||
Thanks for this Te Deum. But do we now have two contributions with the same title: "Te Deum and Jubilate ..." one with the Te Deum only and the other with the Jubilate only? (Sorry to be a pain!) [[User:Marghek|Marghek]] 09:38, 24 May 2012 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 14:38, 24 May 2012
As the Te Deum is not included, would it not be more accurate and more useful to describe this as "Jubilate in A major"? Marghek 04:04, 18 May 2012 (CDT)
Possibly, but I expect to add the Te Deum in about a week, having discovered that a copy of the source is online Jonathang 18:01, 20 May 2012 (CDT)
Thanks for this Te Deum. But do we now have two contributions with the same title: "Te Deum and Jubilate ..." one with the Te Deum only and the other with the Jubilate only? (Sorry to be a pain!) Marghek 09:38, 24 May 2012 (CDT)