User talk:Wim Looyestijn

From ChoralWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome to ChoralWiki! We hope you will contribute much and well. You will probably want to read the help pages. Again, welcome and have fun! Jkelecom (talk) 12:34, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Biber

I'm very much enjoying your fine Biber editions! I started a publication page for Vesperæ longiores ac breviores una cum litaniis Lauretanis and notice several duplicate settings, which should be "disambiguated", as Wikipedia has taught me to say. Dixit Dominus (Heinrich Biber) could be changed as you think best to either Dixit Dominus in g (Heinrich Biber) or Dixit Dominus, C 19 (Heinrich Biber) or even Dixit Dominus de BVM (Heinrich Biber), to avoid confusion with the Dixit Dominus Longior in D, C 13 or the Dixit brevior in C, C 25, or the Dixit a 32, C 11. All the best, and a belated welcome! Richard Mix (talk) 09:16, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Chiara Margarita Cozzolani

Hello Wim, thank you for bringing this composer to CPDL! I'm curious to listen to a few of her works. The spelling error in her name has been corrected as requested. Regards, —Carlos (talk) 16:53, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Salve Regina (Giovanni Battista Riccio)

The work (CPDL #45681) posted under this title is the Regina Coeli, not the Salve Regina -- which you had already posted (CPDL #45680). Can you post the correct Salve Regina? Thanks. -- Chucktalk Giffen 05:13, 28 August 2022 (UTC)


Thanks for noting this. However, I don't seem to be able to get it right. I uploaded the correct pdf (Salve Regina, 137 kB, and listed as "current"), but it still shows the wrong one (Regina Caeli, 110 kB). Wim Looyestijn (talk) 11:48, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Magnificat a 2 chori con strumenti (Giovanni Legrenzi)

Hi Wim! I have posted a new version of the mentioned Legrenzi work alongside your #62118 contribution. First I want to thank you for uploading a MXL file, which I used as a starting point and saved me a lot of transcription work. I would like to point out some minor corrections to your edition which surfaced while checking the source (1667 first print):

- bar 8, Continuo: the source has natural e, but e flat is correct considering Viola da brazzo and Alto II (and the repeated pattern at bar 11)

- bar 23, Viola I and II: both Viole start with the other strings on the second half

- bar 48, Canto I: last note of the measure is b flat

- bar 57, Tenore I: last two b are natural, not sharp

- bar 67, Viola I: g instead of a

- bar 78, Tenore I: missing a sixteenth a as second note (hence the sixteenth rest at the end of the measure disappears)

- bar 80, Alto II: the second note is f sharp instead of e

- bar 96, Alto II: the last e should be flat as it is the first (in the source it is unmarked but inherits the first flat as it is the same measure)

- bar 129, figured bass: the last half should be 3 instead of 2

- bar 130, strings: the b flat chord lasts all measure (as in the source except for Violin II) but it should end after a breve like the second choir (and Violin II in the source) due to the change in harmony on the third half

- bar 133, Canto I, Alto II: Canto I e is natural (marked sharp in the source) and Alto II e is flat. This is true to the source but in contrast with each other and should be marked as such (the decision goes to the performer)

- bar 135, Tenore I: first e is unmarked in the source but should be flat, see figured bass and Alto II among others

Hope this is helpful. Stay well, Beethoby (talk) 20:57, 21 January 2026 (UTC)