User talk:AlistairKirk: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Welcome: new section) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Hi Alistair, welcome to CPDL! Thank you for your first contribution, you seem to have managed everything very well. Way to go! I've made just a few minor corrections to the works page. Best, —[[User:Carlos|Carlos]] [[File:Email.gif|link=User talk:Carlos]] 17:08, 29 April 2015 (UTC) | Hi Alistair, welcome to CPDL! Thank you for your first contribution, you seem to have managed everything very well. Way to go! I've made just a few minor corrections to the works page. Best, —[[User:Carlos|Carlos]] [[File:Email.gif|link=User talk:Carlos]] 17:08, 29 April 2015 (UTC) | ||
== Sancta et immaculata (Andrea Gabrieli) == | |||
Nice edition. I agree entirely with your musica ficta (editorial accidentals). A couple of points.<br> | |||
1. I think ''efferem'' should perhaps be ''efferam'' throughout, as in the other settings of this text.<br> | |||
2. This one is more agruable. I think nescio should be hyphenated ne-sci-o, since church Latin would normally pronounce it neshio, rather than classical Latin neskio.<br> | |||
[[User:Jamesgibb|Jamesgibb]] ([[User talk:Jamesgibb|talk]]) 18:28, 24 February 2018 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:29, 24 February 2018
Welcome
Hi Alistair, welcome to CPDL! Thank you for your first contribution, you seem to have managed everything very well. Way to go! I've made just a few minor corrections to the works page. Best, —Carlos 
17:08, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Sancta et immaculata (Andrea Gabrieli)
Nice edition. I agree entirely with your musica ficta (editorial accidentals). A couple of points.
1. I think efferem should perhaps be efferam throughout, as in the other settings of this text.
2. This one is more agruable. I think nescio should be hyphenated ne-sci-o, since church Latin would normally pronounce it neshio, rather than classical Latin neskio.
Jamesgibb (talk) 18:28, 24 February 2018 (UTC)