Template talk:TextRequestsHeader: Difference between revisions

From ChoralWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(TextRequestsHeader is great)
m (Template talk:TextRequestsCatTxt moved to Template talk:TextRequestsHeader: as per discussion, better to reflect this template's usage)
(No difference)

Revision as of 12:29, 21 October 2008

 Help 

Okay, please enlighten me. This template has been renamed TextRequestsCatTxt, yet it is only to be applied to pages that are not categories - pages in the namespace ChoralWiki. Something needs to be changed here, either: (1) make the ChoralWiki pages into categories or (2) change the name of this template. I hate to be a stickler here, but there is not point in propagating confusion. Since the option (1) isn't presently available (unless one introduces categories such as "English text requests", "Quenya text requests", etc.), I think that this template should be moved to a newly named one ... perhaps back to its origial name.

I agree, Chuck. Carlos' explanation for the move: "stick to the standard naming" would be fine if these DPL pages were categories. As they're not, let's have "TextRequestsText" or "TxtRequestsTxt" (not "TextRequestsTxt"!) Great template though, Carlos! :-) --Bobnotts talk 14:40, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Lol, I'm fighting to find a proper name for this template from the very start, and the last move was again a bad one. I thought that it shouldn't be "body", as the body will be the listings. Another alternative I thought then was "TextRequestsHeader"... but I'll leave it for you guys to please find a good name this time! :) —Carlos Email.gif 16:58, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
"TextRequestsHeader" is great, probably what I would have chosen myself! -- Chucktalk Giffen 11:33, 21 October 2008 (UTC)