Talk:Si bona suscepimus (Costanzo Porta): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Richard Mix (talk | contribs) (move page, I think) |
Richard Mix (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Update CPDL works pages to list under Porta instead of Rore? Score itself says Porta. See recent discussion [[http://forums.cpdl.org/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=6726 here]]. -- [[User:Vaarky|Vaarky]] ([[User talk:Vaarky|talk]]) 14:33, 2 May 2014 (UTC) | Update CPDL works pages to list under Porta instead of Rore? Score itself says Porta. See recent discussion [[http://forums.cpdl.org/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=6726 here]]. -- [[User:Vaarky|Vaarky]] ([[User talk:Vaarky|talk]]) 14:33, 2 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
:Porta doesn't rate a detailed | :Porta doesn't rate a detailed worklist on New Grove, but Rore does and ''Si bona suscepimus'' does not appear there, so I'll make bold to move the page. I don't yet see evidence that the misattribution is more widely spread than cpdl, justifying keeping the misattributed work tag, but one never knows... [[User:Richard Mix|Richard Mix]] ([[User talk:Richard Mix|talk]]) 22:37, 9 June 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:38, 9 June 2014
attribution to Rore
[I've moved Vaarky's comments here, originally on the cleanup template. Richard Mix (talk) 22:37, 9 June 2014 (UTC)]
Update CPDL works pages to list under Porta instead of Rore? Score itself says Porta. See recent discussion [here]. -- Vaarky (talk) 14:33, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
- Porta doesn't rate a detailed worklist on New Grove, but Rore does and Si bona suscepimus does not appear there, so I'll make bold to move the page. I don't yet see evidence that the misattribution is more widely spread than cpdl, justifying keeping the misattributed work tag, but one never knows... Richard Mix (talk) 22:37, 9 June 2014 (UTC)