Talk:Paschal de L'Estocart: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Yes, definitely! Even more: I think we should combine the various editions and keep only one entry for each Psalm in the main list, with the original title (i.e. French): Dutch versions are modern arrangements. [[User:Pierre chepelov|Pierre chepelov]] 16:18, 24 December 2005 (CET) | Yes, definitely! Even more: I think we should combine the various editions and keep only one entry for each Psalm in the main list, with the original title (i.e. French): Dutch versions are modern arrangements. [[User:Pierre chepelov|Pierre chepelov]] 16:18, 24 December 2005 (CET) | ||
quite an improvement.. --[[User:Wursten|Wursten]] 00:31, 25 December 2005 (PST) | |||
Revision as of 08:31, 25 December 2005
Shouldn't we use the FRENCH title 'Pseaume' for all his original compositions here with FRENCH text.. And only PSALM when a DUTCH text is added ??? Wursten 00:44, 19 December 2005 (PST)
Yes, definitely! Even more: I think we should combine the various editions and keep only one entry for each Psalm in the main list, with the original title (i.e. French): Dutch versions are modern arrangements. Pierre chepelov 16:18, 24 December 2005 (CET)
quite an improvement.. --Wursten 00:31, 25 December 2005 (PST)