Talk:O quam suavis est II (Peter Philips): Difference between revisions

From ChoralWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:


I wasn't sure whether to create a new page for my edition or not. Thanks Dave. I have separated the two and put it on a new page. Paul Marchesano ([[User:Marchesa|Marchesa]] 16:07, 7 March 2009 (UTC))
I wasn't sure whether to create a new page for my edition or not. Thanks Dave. I have separated the two and put it on a new page. Paul Marchesano ([[User:Marchesa|Marchesa]] 16:07, 7 March 2009 (UTC))
== should be O Quam Suavis est DominE, not DominUS? ==
{{ItemPost|by=[[User:Vaarky|Vaarky]] 22:34, 18 January 2010 (UTC)|text=
Text on the title is Dominus, but the text of the score is Domine, just like the other (definitely different) setting of O quam suavis Domine by Phillips of different music. Why the Dominus?
}}
:There may be an error in the score, or the text was presented as in the original, preserving the error. Domine is correct as its usage is the vocative case. I recommend renaming the page. Distinction from the other work can be carried out in the usual way, changing both page designations and numbering them, i.e., "O Quam Suavis est Domine (I)" and "O Quam Suavis est Domine (II)". -Paul [[User:Marchesa|Marchesa]] 23:09, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
::Thanks Vaarky for the correction; I followed Paul's suggestion and renamed the pages taking as reference the numbering used in the recordings below, so as to make them match:
::http://www.hyperion-records.co.uk/al.asp?al=CDH55254
::Regards, —[[User:Carlos|Carlos]] [{{fullurl:User talk:Carlos}} {{mail}}] 02:38, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 02:38, 19 January 2010

These two different works need separate pages. I'll get to it in due course, if no-one else does first. --DaveF 15:28, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

I wasn't sure whether to create a new page for my edition or not. Thanks Dave. I have separated the two and put it on a new page. Paul Marchesano (Marchesa 16:07, 7 March 2009 (UTC))

should be O Quam Suavis est DominE, not DominUS?

  • Posted by: Vaarky 22:34, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
 Help 

Text on the title is Dominus, but the text of the score is Domine, just like the other (definitely different) setting of O quam suavis Domine by Phillips of different music. Why the Dominus?

There may be an error in the score, or the text was presented as in the original, preserving the error. Domine is correct as its usage is the vocative case. I recommend renaming the page. Distinction from the other work can be carried out in the usual way, changing both page designations and numbering them, i.e., "O Quam Suavis est Domine (I)" and "O Quam Suavis est Domine (II)". -Paul Marchesa 23:09, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
Thanks Vaarky for the correction; I followed Paul's suggestion and renamed the pages taking as reference the numbering used in the recordings below, so as to make them match:
http://www.hyperion-records.co.uk/al.asp?al=CDH55254
Regards, —Carlos Email.gif 02:38, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://www.cpdl.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:O_quam_suavis_est_II_(Peter_Philips)&oldid=226792"