Talk:Euge caeli porta (Thomas Tallis): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "==Discussion moved from work page== I can't help feeling that it might sound better if the bass part were pitched an octave higher, so that it was mostly above the tenor, serv...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Addition by DF, 6.1.2014 - Paul M is right in that his version with T & B "interchanged" is actually the correct one (at least according to TCM; I don't have access to the original Gyffard Partbooks), suggesting that his original source was defective. | Addition by DF, 6.1.2014 - Paul M is right in that his version with T & B "interchanged" is actually the correct one (at least according to TCM; I don't have access to the original Gyffard Partbooks), suggesting that his original source was defective. | ||
[[Gyffard Partbooks]]; but I couldn't find this work in Wikipedia's index. — [[User:Bcjohnston523|Barry Johnston]] [[User talk:Bcjohnston523|(talk)]] 18:24, 17 October 2019 (UTC) | [[Gyffard Partbooks]]; but I couldn't find this work in [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gyffard_partbooks Wikipedia's index]. — [[User:Bcjohnston523|Barry Johnston]] [[User talk:Bcjohnston523|(talk)]] 18:24, 17 October 2019 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 18:27, 17 October 2019
Discussion moved from work page
I can't help feeling that it might sound better if the bass part were pitched an octave higher, so that it was mostly above the tenor, serving as another alto part. It would be interesting to compare the score with another source or with an authoritative recording, but I don't have one. (Paul Marchesano 2004)
Addition by DF, 6.1.2014 - Paul M is right in that his version with T & B "interchanged" is actually the correct one (at least according to TCM; I don't have access to the original Gyffard Partbooks), suggesting that his original source was defective.
Gyffard Partbooks; but I couldn't find this work in Wikipedia's index. — Barry Johnston (talk) 18:24, 17 October 2019 (UTC)