Talk:Das ist je gewißlich wahr, SWV 388 (Heinrich Schütz): Difference between revisions
m (Created page with ''''DON’T SPLIT.''' The two "works" are the same piece of music, almost completely identical apart from the simplified version of the final "Amen" in the later version – and t…') |
m (Carlos moveu a página Talk:Das ist je gewißlich wahr (Heinrich Schütz) para Talk:Das ist je gewißlich wahr, SWV 388 (Heinrich Schütz): split as discussed) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Split discussion== | |||
'''DON’T SPLIT.''' The two "works" are the same piece of music, almost completely identical apart from the simplified version of the final "Amen" in the later version – and there are ''much'' clearer cases of works currently occupying a single page that ''should'' be split, e.g. where there are substantial differences affecting overall voicing, instrumentation, duration, and sung text. None of those types of issues occur here. The two different SWV numberings are simply due to the works being classified in ''publication'' order, and the work having been published once on its own, and then again in one of Schütz's collections. [[User:Pml|Philip Legge]]<sub>[[User_talk:Pml|Φ talk]] [[Special:Emailuser/Pml|@ mail]]</sub> 01:07, 7 September 2009 (UTC) | '''DON’T SPLIT.''' The two "works" are the same piece of music, almost completely identical apart from the simplified version of the final "Amen" in the later version – and there are ''much'' clearer cases of works currently occupying a single page that ''should'' be split, e.g. where there are substantial differences affecting overall voicing, instrumentation, duration, and sung text. None of those types of issues occur here. The two different SWV numberings are simply due to the works being classified in ''publication'' order, and the work having been published once on its own, and then again in one of Schütz's collections. [[User:Pml|Philip Legge]]<sub>[[User_talk:Pml|Φ talk]] [[Special:Emailuser/Pml|@ mail]]</sub> 01:07, 7 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
'''Please do split''' | |||
In my opinion there are too many differences. There are much more differences than just the ending. Sometimes voices are switched so you definitely need to rehearse again if you want to switch from one version to the other. [[user:geichler|Gerd Eichler]] 22:50, 25 July 2013 (CEST) | |||
'''split''': I tend to agree with splitting. Just by having different catalog numbers and publishing dates is a strong argument in favor of a split, in my opinion. —[[User:Carlos|Carlos]] ([[User talk:Carlos|talk]]) 14:29, 18 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 02:06, 19 August 2013
Split discussion
DON’T SPLIT. The two "works" are the same piece of music, almost completely identical apart from the simplified version of the final "Amen" in the later version – and there are much clearer cases of works currently occupying a single page that should be split, e.g. where there are substantial differences affecting overall voicing, instrumentation, duration, and sung text. None of those types of issues occur here. The two different SWV numberings are simply due to the works being classified in publication order, and the work having been published once on its own, and then again in one of Schütz's collections. Philip LeggeΦ talk @ mail 01:07, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Please do split In my opinion there are too many differences. There are much more differences than just the ending. Sometimes voices are switched so you definitely need to rehearse again if you want to switch from one version to the other. Gerd Eichler 22:50, 25 July 2013 (CEST)
split: I tend to agree with splitting. Just by having different catalog numbers and publishing dates is a strong argument in favor of a split, in my opinion. —Carlos (talk) 14:29, 18 August 2013 (UTC)