ChoralWiki talk:MainAnnouncement: Difference between revisions

From ChoralWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(comments on new template structure)
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
I changed this template to make it easier to add/remove announcement(s) ... the previous form did not allow for adequate previewing announcements(s), since all the material was contained inside "includeonly" and "switch" statements. I've provided three "announcement boxes" (really just {{CiteTemp|DisplayBox}}es with different bgcolors) for up to three announcements. One simply comments out any unused announcement boxes. -- [[User:CHGiffen|Chuck]][[User talk:CHGiffen|<sub><small>'''talk'''</small></sub>]]&nbsp;[[User:Charles H. Giffen|Giffen]][[Charles H. Giffen|<sub>'''♫'''</sub>]] 16:12, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
I changed this template to make it easier to add/remove announcement(s) ... the previous form did not allow for adequate previewing announcements(s), since all the material was contained inside "includeonly" and "switch" statements. I've provided three "announcement boxes" (really just {{CiteTemp|DisplayBox}}es with different bgcolors) for up to three announcements. One simply comments out any unused announcement boxes. -- [[User:CHGiffen|Chuck]][[User talk:CHGiffen|<sub><small>'''talk'''</small></sub>]]&nbsp;[[User:Charles H. Giffen|Giffen]][[Charles H. Giffen|<sub>'''♫'''</sub>]] 16:12, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
:Good idea, Chuck, it's much simpler now. Looking at it now I see that the "switch" was completely superfluous. [[User:Carlos|Carlos]] 21:20, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:20, 2 January 2009

I changed this template to make it easier to add/remove announcement(s) ... the previous form did not allow for adequate previewing announcements(s), since all the material was contained inside "includeonly" and "switch" statements. I've provided three "announcement boxes" (really just DisplayBoxes with different bgcolors) for up to three announcements. One simply comments out any unused announcement boxes. -- Chucktalk Giffen 16:12, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Good idea, Chuck, it's much simpler now. Looking at it now I see that the "switch" was completely superfluous. Carlos 21:20, 2 January 2009 (UTC)