Talk:Tota pulchra es, amica mea

This page (Tota pulchra es, amica mea) should not be merged with the Tota Pulchra es page--the texts are different Winglet (talk) 21:42, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

There's a big project in cleaning up the 2 pages, which might or might not be best begun by not having more than one page marked for cleanup; I'm certainly not a fan of textpages with many different versions. My usual criterion is whether an 'official' version occurs in a liturgical book: Gregobase is a great resource for this. Looking at a few of the 11 works on this …amica mea page, I note that Isaac is identical to the given text, anonymous 1541 uses the 1st 3 lines only (and the work page unhelpfully links to Tota pulchra es Maria instead of here), Belli likewise goes as far as "super omni a aromata." and then continues "Surge propera…". So, there's work still to be done before this page can be really considered a 'text' in its own right. Richard Mix (talk) 22:20, 4 March 2017 (UTC)